Dr. Brinkley’s Tower by Robert Hough


Just over the border, in the sleepy post-revolutionary Mexican town of Corazón de la Fuente, the erection of a mammoth radio tower will soon transform the lives of everyone living under its green-hazed penumbra. Dr Brinkley, the tower’s progenitor, is a million watt charlatan and his heavy brand of hucksterism and patent medicine, pitched to address men’s greatest fear, is wildly successful. But with so much potency on the loose, is it any wonder the citizenry of Corazón de la Fuente end up being shown the business end of his tower?

Robert Hough’s gentle, descriptive prose traces the hopes and fears of a wide selection of Corazón de la Fuente’s favourite sons and daughters in near-sepia tones. From the lame mayor, Miguel Orozco, to the Spanish hacendero, Antonio Garcia, to Madam Félix and the Marias of the House of Gentlemanly Pleasures, Hough treats his subjects with compassion and just enough self-awareness to keep them interesting. But perhaps my favourite of the many citizens of Corazón de la Fuente is the aged molinero, Roberto Pántelas, and his young love, Laura Valesquez. Their sad story, tragic but humane, captivates the reader. How could their end signal anything other than the downfall of Corazón de la Fuente?

Of course Corazón de la Fuente does not go down without a fight. The elder statesmen of the town, together with the young Francisco Ramirez, and the ancient curandera who foretold the malignant effect the tower would have, take it in hand to set things right. But perhaps too much has happened and too much has changed by then.

This is fine writing by an author clearly in command of his craft. A pleasure to read and to recommend.

Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life by Anne Lamott


Writers write, as they say. That is about the only certain advice one can receive from a book on writing and life and the writing life. With a wry, self-deprecating, brutally honest demeanour, Anne Lamott informs her students that the way to become a writer is to sit down every day at the same time with a clean piece of paper or the file on your computer you’ve been slaving over for more than a year—and write. Only those who have actually attempted this will appreciate, along with Lamott, just how difficult it may be to fulfil that simple injunction. She is well aware that you will stare at the page or the screen sometimes for hours on end; that you will reconsider your decision to post-pone the fun you could have had working on your taxes; that the corner of your desk will become endlessly fascinating and just may be the grain of sand in which you will perceive the whole…yes, just about anything is more enticing, at times, than writing.

This book shares a few useful techniques to help your writing process, which I’ll get to in a moment, but what makes it one of the best books on writing that I have read is Lamott’s compassion for others in her situation. Because more than anything else, this is a book about compassion. Compassion for others, certainly, but also compassion for oneself. That, and learning the value of producing an SFD: a “shitty first draft”.

Lamott has a strong belief in the power of writing per se. If you press on, word after damn word, reaching a certain number of words per day (she suggests three hundred as a target), eventually you will complete your SFD. And here is an important tip: don’t show your SFD to anyone. The embarrassment of riches (and the stink) of an SFD should be yours alone. Fortunately, once you’ve got an SFD you can move on to the rewriting stage—because having made something, your job as a writer is to make it better. Of course making it better can take a long time. It may involve sharing your current versions with your writing group, with a trusted but critical colleague, with an editor or your agent, if you have one. The good news is that no matter how bad they think your writing is or how much further you’ve got to go with it, at least you can rest easy that they didn’t see your SFD.

By all means borrow this book from your local public library. And when you’ve finished reading it, go out and find it in a bookshop somewhere. Because you’ll want to have it on the shelf in your office to glance at when you are staring at that blank page (or screen) to remind you that, well, writers write. (P.S. If you think this review is bad, you should have seen my SFD.) Recommended.

Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë


The characters in Emily Brontë’s novel are so extreme, so given over to their passions, so driven and wilful that you will, certainly, want to pull your own hair out. From the dissipated yet cruel Hindley, to the emotionally divided and divisive Cathy, to the mindlessly foolish Isabella, and her ineffectual brother, Edgar, to the stunted, brutish Hareton, it is a cavalcade of distasteful, even monstrous, types. But none compare to the fiendish Heathcliff himself, whose unrelenting vengeful monomania brings ruin upon them all. How Heathcliff’s perverse passion for Catherine came to represent any sort of ideal of romantic devotion in the many years subsequent to the novel’s publication is a mystery to me.

If possible, it might be best to set aside the principal characters and their extreme emotions and actions, and turn instead to the descriptive prose with which Emily Brontë renders the wild moors, the relentless inclement weather, and the brief wonder of spring or a sunny summer day. Even more intriguing is the bracketed narrative technique, initiated by the loquaciously risible Mr. Lockwood and then, more prosaically, carried forward by Ellen Dean. That Ellen Dean at one point encourages Mr. Lockwood to pursue a possible marriage with the younger Catherine deliciously risks the confusion of narrative and plot, and Mr. Lockwood does well to get himself as far away from Thrushcross Grange and Wuthering Heights as possible. His return later in the year rightly heralds the wrapping up of loose ends and the natural dénouement of the tale.

Wuthering Heights, even today, seems so singular, so extreme that, if you still have hair at the end of it, you might wish to set it on its own shelf in your library, isolated and incomparable. A curious, dark masterpiece recommended only for the brave of heart.

Book club discussions

It never ceases to amaze me how discussion of a novel serves to round out your perspective. Last night, the local book club I attend was discussing Room by Emma Donoghue (see my brief review below).  The discussion focussed on the second half of the book, almost as though the content of the first half was too horrific to entertain. Nearly all thought the author had made good choices, especially in regard to the near absence of time spent on the perpetrator of the crime. The mothers present were nonplussed by the breastfeeding of young Jack well into his fifth year. And most had interesting comments to make about the value of attention and protection that Jack’s Ma is able to provide him prior to their escape.

No one, other than me, was troubled by the risks inherent in choosing to employ a quirky (almost alien) child narrator. But I still worry about it. Such a narrator provides lots of opportunity for an author to make witty and insightful observations. But I think that, increasingly, as the story develops, the reader must begin to lose emotional sympathy for the narrator. This is because we have no idea what goes on in the heads of these peculiar narrators, and thus we have no way of judging the naturalness of what they say and do. They could, in effect, say anything at all.

Most of the characters that we think are well rendered in a novel are not like that. 400 pages in, Jane Eyre is constrained by her character, her history, and our working understanding of what young women are like, to say and do only a limited number of things. That’s what gives a novel a kind of determinism, if that is an appropriate term. The preceding pages push the novel towards its conclusion, whatever that might be. In the case of Room, that cannot happen. Which, I think, is why the second half feels, to me, like it is meandering, and also explains why the tidying that occurs at the very end might be considered unsatisfactory.

So, once again a lively and friendly book club meeting has helped me sharpen some of my intuitions about aspects of a novel into a more or less coherent view that I can now test on my future reading. (I may well yet revise this view considerably.) Surely it is one of the reasons I enjoy these meetings so much.

Normal posting resumes

Over the past month, I posted here some of the short reviews I wrote this past year on LibraryThing: reviews of 29 of the 59 books I’ve read to date. I chose those reviews where I thought I had something useful to say, good or bad, about the book.  Some books leave me feeling a bit ‘meh’. There isn’t a lot to say about such books. Other books are weak and the less said about them the better. I shall continue posting selected reviews here over the remainder of the year and then make a decision about whether or not to continue the practice.  As ever, comments on my brief reviews (or other posts) are most welcome.